CENTER ON BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE

BODY-MIND CONNECTION

BEHAVIORAL GENETICS

Behavioral Genetics:  Research Article

Behavioral Genetics Menu

Neurologic and Developmental Disability after Extremely Preterm Birth

CITATION:  Marlow, N., Wolke, D.M., et al.  Neurologic and Developmental Disability at Six Years of Age after Extremely Preterm Birth.  New England J of Medicine, vol. 352, No.1. pp 9

ABSTRACT: 

Background.  Birth before 26 weeks of gestation is associated with a high prevalence of neurologic and developmental disabilities in the infant during the first two years of life.

Methods.  We studied at the time of early school age children who had been born at 25 or fewer
completed weeks of gestation in the United Kingdom and Ireland in 1995. Each child had been evaluated at 30 months of age. The children underwent standardized cognitive and neurologic assessments at six years of age. Disability was defined as severe (indicating dependence on caregivers), moderate, or mild according to predetermined criteria.

Results.  Of 308 surviving children, 241 (78 percent) were assessed at a median age of six years
and four months; 160 classmates delivered at full term served as a comparison group. Although the use of test reference norms showed that cognitive impairment (defined as results more than 2 SD below the mean) was present in 21 percent of the children born extremely preterm (as compared with 1 percent in the standardized data), this value rose to 41 percent when the results were compared with those for their classmates. The rates of severe, moderate, and mild disability were 22 percent, 24 percent, and 34 percent, respectively; disabling cerebral palsy was present in 30 children (12 percent). Among children with severe disability at 30 months of age, 86 percent still had moderate-to-severe disability at 6 years of age. In contrast, other disabilities at the age of 30 months were poorly predictive of developmental problems at 6 years of age.

Conclusions.  Among extremely preterm children, cognitive and neurologic impairment is common
at school age. A comparison with their classroom peers indicates a level of impairment that is greater than is recognized with the use of standardized norms.

References

1. Saigal S, den Ouden L, Wolke D, et al.
School-age outcomes in children who were
extremely low birth weight from four international
population-based cohorts. Pediatrics
2003;112:943-50.

2. Whitfield MF, Grunau RV, Holsti L.
Extremely premature (< or = 800 g) schoolchildren:
multiple areas of hidden disability.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;77:
F85-F90.

3. Taylor HG, Klein N, Hack M. Schoolage
consequences of birth weight less than
750 g: a review and update. Dev Neuropsychol
2000;17:289-321.

4. Hack M, Flannery DJ, Schluchter M,
Cartar L, Borawski E, Klein N. Outcomes in
young adulthood for very-low-birth-weight
infants. N Engl J Med 2002;346:149-57.

5. Fanaroff AA, Poole K, Duara S, et al.
Micronates: 401-500 grams: the NICHD Neonatal
Research Network Experience 1996-
2001. Pediatr Res 2003;54:398A. abstract.

6. Lorenz JM, Wooliever DE, Jetton JR,
Paneth N. A quantitative review of mortality
and developmental disability in extremely
premature newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc
Med 1998;152:425-35.

7. Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson
AT, Wilkinson AR. Neurologic and developmental
disability after extremely preterm
birth. N Engl J Med 2000;343:378-84.

8. Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson AT, Marlow
N, Wilkinson AR. The EPICure study:
outcomes to discharge from hospital for
infants born at the threshold of viability.
Pediatrics 2000;106:659-71.

9. Jacobs SE, O’Brien K, Inwood S, Kelly EN,
Whyte HE. Outcome of infants 23-26 weeks’
gestation pre and post surfactant. Acta Paediatr
2000;89:959-65.

10. Disability and perinatal care: a report
of two working groups convened by the
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit and
the former Oxford Regional Health Authority.
March 1994. Oxford, England: NPEU and
ORHA, 1995.

11. Evans P, Alberman E, Johnson A, Mutch
L. Standardisation of recording and reporting
cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol
1987;29:272.

12. Kaufman A, Kaufman N. Kaufman
Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC).
Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service,
1983.

13. Griffiths R. The abilities of young children.
Somerset, U.K.: Young and Son, 1970.

14. Korkman M, Kirk U, Kemp S. Manual for
the NEPSY: a developmental neuropsychological
assessment. San Antonio, Tex.: Psychological
Testing Corporation, 1998.

15. Wolke D, Ratschinski G, Ohrt B, Riegel
K. The cognitive outcome of very preterm
infants may be poorer than often reported:
an empirical investigation of how methodological
issues make a big difference. Eur
J Pediatr 1994;153:906-15.

16. Flynn J. Searching for justice: the discovery
of IQ gains over time. American Psychologist
1999;54:5-20.

17. Wolke D, Meyer R. Cognitive status, language
attainment, and prereading skills of
6-year-old very preterm children and their
peers: the Bavarian Longitudinal Study. Dev
Med Child Neurol 1999;41:94-109.

18. Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock
MM, Anand KJ. Cognitive and behavioral
outcomes of school-aged children who
were born preterm: a meta-analysis. JAMA
2002;288:728-37.

19. Aylward GP, Pfeiffer SI, Wright A, Verhulst
SJ. Outcome studies of low birth weight
infants published in the last decade: a metaanalysis.
J Pediatr 1989;115:515-20.

20. Laucht M, Esser G, Baving L, et al. Behavioral
sequelae of perinatal insults and early
family adversity at 8 years of age. J Am Acad
Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;39:1229-
37.

21. Taylor HG, Burant CJ, Holding PA, Klein
N, Hack M. Sources of variability in sequelae
of very low birth weight. Neuropsychol Dev
Cogn Sect C Child Neuropsychol 2002;8:
163-78.

22. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Children who
“outgrew” cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 1982;69:
529-36.

23. Drillien CM. Abnormal neurologic signs
in the first year of life in low-birthweight
infants: possible prognostic significance.
Dev Med Child Neurol 1972;14:575-84.

24. Kraemer S. The fragile male. BMJ 2000;
321:1609-12.  

25. Brothwood M, Wolke D, Gamsu H, Benson

J, Cooper D. Prognosis of the very low
birthweight baby in relation to gender. Arch
Dis Child 1986;61:559-64.

26. Hack M, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of children
of extremely low birthweight and gestational
age in the 1990’s. Early Hum Dev
1999;53:193-218.

27. Emsley HC, Wardle SP, Sims DG, Chiswick
ML, D’Souza SW. Increased survival
and deteriorating developmental outcome in
23 to 25 week old gestation infants, 1990-4
compared with 1984-9. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed 1998;78:F99-F104.

28. Piecuch RE, Leonard CH, Cooper BA,
Kilpatrick SJ, Schlueter MA, Sola A. Outcome
of infants born at 24-26 weeks’ gestation:
II. Neurodevelopmental outcome.
Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:809-14.

29. Doyle LW. Outcome at 5 years of age of
children 23 to 27 weeks’ gestation: refining
the prognosis. Pediatrics 2001;108:134-41.

30. Johnson A, Townshend P, Yudkin P, Bull
D, Wilkinson AR. Functional abilities at age 4 years of children born before 29 weeks of
gestation. BMJ 1993;306:1715-8.

31. Finnstrom O, Gaddlin PO, Leijon I, Samuelsson
S, Wadsby M. Very-low-birth-weight
children at school age: academic achievement,
behavior and self-esteem and relation
to risk factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
2003;14:75-84.

32. Lorenz JM, Paneth N, Jetton JR, den
Ouden L, Tyson JE. Comparison of management
strategies for extreme prematurity in
New Jersey and the Netherlands: outcomes
and resource expenditure. Pediatrics 2001;
108:1269-74.

33. D’Angio CT, Sinkin RA, Stevens TP, et al.
Longitudinal, 15-year follow-up of children
born at less than 29 weeks’ gestation after
introduction of surfactant therapy into a
region: neurologic, cognitive, and educational
outcomes. Pediatrics 2002;110:1094-
102.

34. Hille ET, den Ouden AL, Saigal S, et al.
Behavioural problems in children who weigh
1000 g or less at birth in four countries. Lancet
2001;357:1641-3.

35. Botting N, Powls A, Cooke RW, Marlow
N. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorders
and other psychiatric outcomes in very low
birthweight children at 12 years. J Child Psychol
Psychiatry 1997;38:931-41.