CENTER ON BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
ADDITIONAL MATERIALDIAGNOSTIC TESTING
A. Rowan-szal; Matthew l. Hiller; Lois R. Chatham; D. Dwayne Simpson.
Hair Analysis: A Tool to Identify Probationers in Need of Drug
Federal Probation v59 p58-62 S 1995.
Abstract: The increasing prevalence of drug use in criminal populations over the past decade has led the criminal justice system to implement a variety of urine testing programs across the Nation (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1989). Drug treatment referrals sometimes are made with the aid of test results from urines collected soon after arrest, and individuals have been reincarcerated based on the detection of drug use during supervision. Although urinalysis as a method of drug detection has many benefits, it also has its drawbacks. On the one hand, it is highly accurate when done correctly, has a quick turnaround time for results, and has won broad endorsement within the criminal justice system. On the other hand, urinalysis involves an invasive process for observing urine collection, inconvenience in its handling and storage, and a limited time period after use in which drugs can be detected accurately (Magura, Freeman, Siddiqi, & Lipton, 1992).
In recent years, hair analysis has emerged as another system of drug assaying, also potentially useful in the treatment referral and surveillance process (Baer, Baumgartner, Hill, & Blahd, 1991; Baumgartner, Hill, & Blahd, 1989; Harrison, 1995; Stephenson, 1993). As a chemically stable and permanent record of drug use information, hair absorbs drugs and their metabolites as it grows at the rate of approximately one-half inch a month. Depending on the length or section of hair available and analyzed, therefore, drug use history can be determined. This offers the potential for the testing of individuals who had previously absconded or failed to keep appointments with their probation or parole officer. Other advantages for hair analysis over urinalysis include less invasive collection procedures, fewer storage problems, and lower susceptibility to adulteration.
This study demonstrated that hair analysis can be useful in identifying cocaine-using probationers when making treatment referral decisions.
Baer, D.J., Baumgartner, W.A., Hill, V.A., & Blahd, W.H. (1991). Hair analysis for the detection of drug use in pretrial, probation, and parole populations. Federal Probation, 55, 3-10.
Baumgartner, W.A., Hill, V.A., & Blahd, W.H. (1989). Hair analysis for drugs of abuse. Journal of Forensic Science, 34(6), 1433-1453.
Baumgartner, W.A., & Kippenberger, D.J. (1994, October). Review of selected field studies on hair analysis in the criminal justice system. Presented at the 1994 SOFT/TIAFT conference, Tampa, FL.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1989). Drug use and crimes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
DuPont, R.L. (1993). Criminal justice system (CJS) applications for hair analysis for drugs of abuse. Paper presented at the Hair Analysis for Illicit Drugs: Applications for Criminal Justice conference, New Orleans, LA.
Harrison, L.D. (1995). The validity of self-reported data on drug use. The Journal of Drug Issues, 25(1), 91-111.
Knight, K., Holcom, M., & Simpson, D.D. (1994). Psychological functioning and motivation scales: Manual on psychometric properties. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research.
Magura, S., Freeman, R.C., Siddiqi, Q., & Lipton, D.S. (1992). The validity of hair analysis for detecting cocaine and heroin use among addicts. The International Journal of the Addictions, 27(1), 51-69.
Mieczkowski, T., Landress, H.J., Newel, R., & Coletti, S.D. (1993, January). Testing hair for illicit drug use. National Institute of Justice--Research in Brief (NCJ 138539).
Mieczkowski, T., & Newel, R. (1993). Comparing hair and urine assays for cocaine and marijuana. Federal Probation, 57(2), 59-67.
Psychemedics Corporation. (1991). Policies and procedures manual. Santa Monica, CA: Author.
Robins, L.N., Helzer, J.E., Croughan, J., & Ratcliff, K.S. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 381-389.
Simpson, D.D. (1993). TCU/DATAR forms manual: Drug abuse treatment for AIDS-risks reduction (DATAR). Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research.
Simpson, D.D., & Joe, G.W. (1993). Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy, 30, 357-368.
Stephenson, R.L. (1993, June). Update on hair testing for drugs of abuse. Paper presented at the National Institute of Justice--Bureau of Justice Assistance Fourth Annual Evaluating Drug Control Initiatives Conference.